Texmacs vs emacs full#

That core question aside, you can start to get into the finer points. Or do you want an incredibly powerful text editor which has a somewhat steep initial ramp but if you train yourself correctly can yield incredible editing productivity without any programming because of the combinations of key chords you can use? I suspect emacs would have been a better experience if I wasn't married to vim keybindings already and if I was willing to use eshell instead of the terminal emulator.Ī key thing I'm surprised nobody here seems to be mentioning in all the Spacemacs cheering is simply this:ĭo you want an incredibly powerful programming environment optimized for text processing that has good interactive editing extensions, all written in Lisp? It can and it's way more reliable than the one in emacs.

Emacs taught me that tmux ain't nuffin' but shite.ĭecided to see if neovims terminal could act as a regular text buffer.

Texmacs vs emacs full#

Having the full power of a vimlike editor in my terminal is aahmazing. It let you switch from like input mode to regular buffer editor mode. I found out that the real magic was the integrated terminal. I'd been using vs code because the vim emulation is good enough and the setup is easy.īut finally ditched ot because of it's super crappy container integration.ĭecided to give emacs a go based on the whole rumored lisp magic and the fact that the lorri project documentation used it for an example.īut actually the lisp magic is bunk because the terminal and many other plugins were basically unusably buggy.