#Dxo photolab vs capture one for olympus professional#

In some areas of photography Capture One is the industry standard, and you may well be expected to use it in a potentially fast working environment e.g. Good as DXO is, if you are looking at working in the industry, I suspect that for some time to come, Lightroom, Photoshop and Capture One, are the programs you need to invest time in learning. I have used DXO off and on for years, and will be upgrading to the newest version, but in spite of many comparisons over the years, I still have C1 as my main raw processor as on balance it seems to more consistently allows 'me' to get the quality I'm happy with. But lots of people very happy with the quality they get from DXO/LR etc. and with equal levels of skill, the differences in quality between the programs are subtle.

Thank you so much for such a concise response. I am a personal photographer, couldn't care less for tethering. Part of the reason I chose my D3300 over the Nikon D3400 was because I didn't want GPS/Wi-fi. Meaning? That kind of 'convenient feature' has as many negative aspects as it does positive ones.

#Dxo photolab vs capture one for olympus professional#

Really, as a mobile 'off-road' photographer who shoots raw (that's a pun) as opposed to scripted professional shoots I am OK with not being plugged into the grid. What I am after is image processing and final output that brings out the best possible proof as printed on my Canon Pixma Pro-100S.

Up until now I have been quite happy, but it's like until you see an improvement in quality it is then that you realize what you have been working on previous up until that point is actually lackluster.

This is what I experienced earlier with side by side comparisons of Capture One and DXO PhotoLab. The 2 essentials I would say for Capture One that are missing in DXO's are like you mentioned, Color Grading Tools and the Luma Curve as opposed to RGB Curve.